Merlin (2008) BBC series. I finished watching episodes 1-6 and give it 2.5 out of 5 stars, but it's still passable. I can see it being popular with a younger audience, the now young-adult-aged Harry Potter fans. And Colin Morgan as Merlin is charming and earnest, the correct humble qualities of a future powerful wizard.
A young, fresh-faced Merlin comes to Camelot at a time when magic is banned. While under the care of Gaius, the court physician, Merlin learns magic secretly. The plots usually involve Merlin covertly using magic to save the town or a person.
Why did I choose to watch this Merlin? To be honest, I was hoping for something closer to Harry Potter's world. I imagine, Julian Murphy and Johnny Caps, the creators of Merlin, pitching it as "Harry Potter but without the magic!" as a selling point. Sounds crazy when I put it that way, doesn't it? But it makes sense if you file it as another attempt to Humanize the Hero (Merlin was inspired by Smallville, the TV series on Superman's early life). For viewers to relate to Merlin, he must struggle, he cannot be born certain of his fate or abilities. It is also best to make him an awkward young man.
I like revision. I enjoy stories, myths and legends retold from another perspective. BUT there are some "facts" that are sacred: Merlin cannot be King Arthur's peer. Merlin is at least a hundred if not hundreds of years older than him. Therefore, a story faithful to Merlin's origins should begin during the Age of the Hobbits. And no, Merlin cannot be Arthur's manservant. It's disrespectful!
One last thing, the most effect revisionist story of King Arthur, by far, is the three part series based on Marion Zimmer Bradley's novel, The Mists of Avalon (2001). Julianna Margulies played Morgana and that is the role I remember her for.To this day, when I think about King Arthur and his merry men, I remember Morgana.








